Re: Client Permissions required for Integrated Authentication?
From: Paul Haigh (Haigh_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 05/03/05
- Next message: Steven: "IIS 5.0 FTP"
- Previous message: Ben: "Re: Why rename the IUSR account?"
- In reply to: Tom Kaminski [MVP]: "Re: Client Permissions required for Integrated Authentication?"
- Next in thread: Tom Kaminski [MVP]: "Re: Client Permissions required for Integrated Authentication?"
- Reply: Tom Kaminski [MVP]: "Re: Client Permissions required for Integrated Authentication?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 07:25:02 -0700
"Tom Kaminski [MVP]" wrote:
> "Paul Haigh" <Paul Haigh@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A0EEB7CE-69DC-4BEE-B084-E3ABE2E4081D@microsoft.com...
> > Hi there,
> >
<snip>
>
> Sounds like the NTFS permissions on the content need to be adjusted. The IE
> issue you mention would not be affected by whether or not users are part of
> the amdin group. Make sure your users have at least NTFS Read permissions
> on your content files and folders.
>
Hi Tom,
I thought that as well to start with, but when I added 'Everyone' to the
NTFS permissions for the content, nothing changed. We didn't see the boxes
go away until we added the NT account to the local PC's 'Administrators'
group - then the issue appears to go away immediately.
Alternatively, the login box can be removed by putting back 'Anonymous
Authentication', which isn't a huge surprise.
Cheers,
Paul
- Next message: Steven: "IIS 5.0 FTP"
- Previous message: Ben: "Re: Why rename the IUSR account?"
- In reply to: Tom Kaminski [MVP]: "Re: Client Permissions required for Integrated Authentication?"
- Next in thread: Tom Kaminski [MVP]: "Re: Client Permissions required for Integrated Authentication?"
- Reply: Tom Kaminski [MVP]: "Re: Client Permissions required for Integrated Authentication?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
