Re: IIS Seperate Partition?
From: Bernard (qbernard_at_hotmail.com.discuss)
Date: 06/01/04
- Next message: Simon: "Re: Access Denied"
- Previous message: Paul Lynch: "Re: Secure and non-secure message"
- In reply to: Paul Lynch: "Re: IIS Seperate Partition?"
- Next in thread: John Alderson: "Re: IIS Seperate Partition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:20:29 +0800
I see ! I know now. but it is using two exploits then.
it's using a)directory travese and b)buffer overflow.
a buffer overflow could be using directory travesal or not using it, to
overrun the program buffer.
-- Regards, Bernard Cheah http://www.tryiis.com/ http://support.microsoft.com/ http://www.msmvps.com/bernard/ "Paul Lynch" <paul.lynch@nospam.com> wrote in message news:b2hob01a5t0p9s98dmkocfpmrf8adqncdq@4ax.com... > On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 16:08:02 +0800, "Bernard" > <qbernard@hotmail.com.discuss> wrote: > > >Errr.... not sure. but I guess no ? > >As it's two different techniques, and the former mainly execute arbitary > >codes to attack. which does not really involve in directory travese ? > > The Nimda worm (which was essentially a directory traversal attack) > made use of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities previously exploited > by the Code Red II worm. > > > Regards, > > Paul Lynch > MCSE
- Next message: Simon: "Re: Access Denied"
- Previous message: Paul Lynch: "Re: Secure and non-secure message"
- In reply to: Paul Lynch: "Re: IIS Seperate Partition?"
- Next in thread: John Alderson: "Re: IIS Seperate Partition?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]