Re: Basic question on Windows Integrated Security
From: Timo (timo_at_anonymous.com)
Date: 03/25/04
- Next message: Tom Kaminski [MVP]: "Re: IIS4 and NT; clear text passwords"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: buffer overrun attack"
- In reply to: Ken Schaefer: "Re: Basic question on Windows Integrated Security"
- Next in thread: Ken Schaefer: "Re: Basic question on Windows Integrated Security"
- Reply: Ken Schaefer: "Re: Basic question on Windows Integrated Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:38:23 -0500
Ken,
Thanks for the clarifications. Beginning to see some light through
the trees ;-)
Is the default Web Application Pool process identity, like the
IUSR_<machinename> account, local to the machine so that it too
cannot be granted permissions on remote resources? If we were to
specify a particular domain account (with requisite SQL
permissions) as the Web Application Pool process identity, are we
then required to create some sort of special relationship ("trust
relationship?") between the SQL server and that domain account?
I'm confused by the articles I've been reading and the advice I've
been getting on this; some say to assign Service Principal Names
and others say this is unnecessary. We're Win2003 with
ActiveDirectory, IIS6, SQL2000.
Thanks
Timo
In article <eiSgGdgEEHA.3424@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
kenREMOVE@THISadOpenStatic.com writes...
>Note: the IUSR_<machinename> account is, by default, local to the webserver
>and can't be assigned permissions to remote resources. You could change this
>to a domain account if you wanted to
>
>Note: ASP.Net does not use IUSR_<machinename> by default, unless you
>configure <identity impersonate="true"> on IIS5, ASP.Net uses the
>Machine\ASPNet account by default (you can change this in machine.config for
>example). In IIS6 ASP.Net uses the Web Application Pool process identity
>(configurable via the IIS Manager).
>
>
- Next message: Tom Kaminski [MVP]: "Re: IIS4 and NT; clear text passwords"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: buffer overrun attack"
- In reply to: Ken Schaefer: "Re: Basic question on Windows Integrated Security"
- Next in thread: Ken Schaefer: "Re: Basic question on Windows Integrated Security"
- Reply: Ken Schaefer: "Re: Basic question on Windows Integrated Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|