Re: 2003 Web Server Security Flaw
From: Robert Waite (bob2dev_at_tampabay.rr.com)
Date: 12/30/03
- Next message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: anyone seen this problem?"
- Previous message: Mike Larson: "anyone seen this problem?"
- In reply to: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: 2003 Web Server Security Flaw"
- Next in thread: Jeff Cochran: "Re: 2003 Web Server Security Flaw"
- Reply: Jeff Cochran: "Re: 2003 Web Server Security Flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:13:07 -0500
Thanks to Jeff and Karl for useful and throughly professional replies!
Robert Waite
"Karl Levinson [x y] mvp" <levinson_k@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:uVQHpKizDHA.2388@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
> "Jeff Cochran" <jcochran.nospam@naplesgov.com> wrote in message
> news:3ff93b57.608328620@msnews.microsoft.com...
>
> > Not exactly. They may exhibit some client exploits, but in the cases
> > I've seen you'd have to either browse to a web site or download email
> > or a file to exploit any holes. Since you wouldn't normally do any of
> > this on your web server, you're sort of safe.
>
> I think you've just come up with a good slogan for the next ad campaign:
> "Windows 2003: You're sort of safe." Or, "Windows 2003: Don't browse
the
> web or check your email." Are we supposed to feel OK that our enterprise
> server farm is "sort of safe?"
>
> If these products such as OE are so unsafe, we should also be upset about
> them being mandatory and unremovable in workstations as well as server
> products, where "just don't check your email or browse the web" or "just
use
> Group Policy" isn't a very workable option. A truly secure OS would give
> you a way to disable unneeded components.
>
>
> > Also, you can disable file associations with these programs so even
> > clicking on a file on a web site won't launch them. Especially
> > Netmeeting, where remote desktop is disabled by default anyway.
>
> A software company that is serious about committing security over
marketing
> and market share, they would have done so years ago with these and many
> other file associations.
>
>
>
- Next message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: anyone seen this problem?"
- Previous message: Mike Larson: "anyone seen this problem?"
- In reply to: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: 2003 Web Server Security Flaw"
- Next in thread: Jeff Cochran: "Re: 2003 Web Server Security Flaw"
- Reply: Jeff Cochran: "Re: 2003 Web Server Security Flaw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|