Thanks for the info

From: Craig Gillette (craig_at_accessorystore.com)
Date: 08/21/03 

Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:54:01 -0700

Thanks for the info, I am not going to use IPSec. I am
going to look into using our Symanyec VPN Appliance box to
block incoming traffic on those ports, and maybe go into
the TCP/IP properties and use the filtering and other
things.
Thanks.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: TCP/IP Filtering Question
    ... Steve's advice to use IPSec is excellent and far to few ... Ipsec filtering will not block multicast and broadcast traffic, ... > For what you are doing you might want to try ipsec filtering policy using> permit and block fitter actions instead on that router computer. ... If you do> not want the same ipsec policy applied to both adapters, then configure the> actual IP address of the network adapter you want to filter instead of "my ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: TCP/IP Filtering Question
    ... Herb Martin ... >>> For what you are doing you might want to try ipsec filtering policy ... >>> actual IP address of the network adapter you want to filter instead of ... Ipsec filtering will not block multicast and broadcast ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • RE: TCP/IP Filtering problem on W2KAS
    ... These are definitely legitimate security concerns of the Win2K ... I have employed this technique to bypass IPSec port ... Port filtering with IPSec leaves you vulnerable because only the source port ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)
  • Re: Microsoft Strategic Technology Protection Program
    ... Microsoft Strategic Technology Protection Program ... > Another potential area of confusion lies in IPSec. ... you can use the packet filtering possibilites of the RRAS ...
    (NT-Bugtraq)
  • Re: TCP/IP Filtering
    ... IPsec filtering, NOT the TCP/IP filtering feature. ... Generally, TCP and UDP connections use two port numbers, not just one... ... See below for more info and links about both TCP/IP Filtering and IPsec ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)