Re: URLScan and Hacking

From: David Wang [Msft] (someone_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 06/21/03

  • Next message: Sandi - Microsoft MVP: "Re: ** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING - answers to frequently asked questions"
    Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:17:06 -0700
    
    

    I'm not certain how one comes to the conclusion that URLScan "announces" its
    presence. The only thing it does is reject requests with the same 404
    response that IIS would have used. From a hacker's perspective, since they
    know *nothing* about what's on a given system a priori, they can't tell
    whether the 404 is "security induced" or not. Of course, they can do some
    behavior matching and possibly *guess* that URLScan is installed, but so
    what?

    I'd think that if URLScan's presence alters hacker mentality, it'd be to
    deter them. Suppose that URLScan "annouces" its presence in some manner as
    determined by the hacker. If I was the hacker, I'd target those that show
    no signs of URLScan because it's likely to be unmanaged and unpatched (owner
    did not care enough to even put the basic free security tools onto the
    server).

    In these days of script automation, it's cheap for an attack to be
    indiscriminant. So, arguments of "Security through Obscurity" simply will
    not work. You'll get targeted regardless of whether you have URLScan
    "announcing" its presence, so the only safe thing to do is to manage your
    servers and stay up to date. The only way to gain this peace of mind is...
    to be actually secure.

    -- 
    //David
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    //
    "jim" <tjnaz2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    news:062d01c336a9$72503d60$a101280a@phx.gbl...
    Hello,
    We're running IISLockDown and URLScan in our web hosting
    center. A co-worker asked about the risk of URLScan
    announcing its presence. My boss feels that since it can
    announce it presence, it invites us to be hacked more
    often. I feel that it has the opposite effect. Similar to
    seeing a "Beware of Dog" sign and seeing a big dog with
    teeth. You can get in but it will not be easy.
    Has anyone seen an increase in their servers being hacked
    since installing these 2 utilities? Has anyone had their
    machine hacked at all since installing these 2 utilities?
    I appreciate any input.
    Cheers.
    

  • Next message: Sandi - Microsoft MVP: "Re: ** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING - answers to frequently asked questions"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: URLScan and Hacking
      ... A co-worker asked about the risk of URLScan ... >announcing its presence. ... My boss feels that since it can ... >machine hacked at all since installing these 2 utilities? ...
      (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
    • URLScan and Hacking
      ... A co-worker asked about the risk of URLScan ... announcing its presence. ... seeing a "Beware of Dog" sign and seeing a big dog with ... machine hacked at all since installing these 2 utilities? ...
      (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
    • Re: Logfile question
      ... Where can I find this functionality inside Windows Server 2003 webserver? ... > integrated UrlScan features into their server management practices for IIS ... > and for other Microsoft servers. ...
      (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
    • More details on ASP.NET vulnerability
      ... Here are some ways to prevent this and other related attacks that might appear in the future: ... Use URLScan, even on IIS 6 servers. ...
      (NT-Bugtraq)
    • Re: Outlook Web Access Issue
      ... Yeah, I got that too when I first setup! ... However that only fixed it internally, where URLScan is install on the FE ... and all the BE servers. ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)