Re: HFNETCHK -v

From: Stephen Pak (asiats@hotmail.com)
Date: 11/21/02 

From: "Stephen Pak" <asiats@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:42:22 -0800

Charles,

Thank you for your response.

I did use hfnetchk with "-v" already. However, it always gives me the
following message:

Note MSxx-xxx Qxxxxxx
Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

I copy and paste the result from hfnetchk in here.

 * WINDOWS 2000 SERVER SP3

 Note MS01-022 Q296441
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Warning MS02-008 Q318203
 File C:\WINNT\system32\msxml3.dll has a file version that is
 greater than what is expected.

 Note MS02-053 Q324096
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Note MS02-064 Q327522
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 * INTERNET INFORMATION SERVICES 5.0

 Information
 All necessary hotfixes have been applied.

 * INTERNET EXPLORER 6 SP1

 Note MS02-065 Q329414
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 * SQL SERVER 2000 SP2

 Note MS02-030 Q321858
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Note MS02-030 Q321858
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Note MS02-030 Q321460
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Note MS02-030 Q320833
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Note MS02-035 Q263968
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Note MS02-039 Q323875
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Note MS02-040 Q326573
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Note MS02-040 Q326573
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

 Note MS02-061 Q316333
 Please refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.

For all the above results, is that meant I still have problems on my system?

Thank you agian!

Stephen

"Charles Otstot" <saries@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:#uRRSvNkCHA.1572@tkmsftngp09...
> Hi Stephan,
>
> The yellow X's simply says (as indicated) that the xml file used by MBSA
> cannot *confirm* that the specific patch is installed. The referenced KB
> article (Q306460) will (in general) cross-reference the KB article you can
> use to confirm that said patch *is* installed (e.g. MS01-022 has multiple
> versions of msdaipp.dll to be considered "patched", there is a KB article
> detailing which versions are correct and which are not).
>
> The red X indicates that (for a patch the xml file *can* confirm) one or
> more criteria are not met within the xml file to consider the patch
> (correctly) installed. Running hfnetchk with the "-v" option will indicate
> *why* the xml file considers a patch not installed.
>
> In the case of MS02-008 specifically, if you have IE 6 SP1 installed, the
> patch will show up with a red X. SP1 installs a version of msxml3 that is
> newer than the patched version of the file (the newer version is fine even
> though it's not reflected in the xml file). Bear in mind that you may have
> anywhere from 1-3 separate patches to install for this bulletin, so the
> above may or may not apply in your case. Again, running hfnetchk with the
> "-v" option will tell you why the xml file considers this specific patch
not
> installed.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Charlie
>
>
> "Stephen Pak" <asiats@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:#Q93I0MkCHA.1700@tkmsftngp09...
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I just installed the MS02-065 patch on my system. However, when I run
the
> > MS Baseline Security Analyzer, it tells me that the hotfix cannot
confirm
> > (Yellow X).
> >
> > In addition, the following hotfixes are either missing or cannot
confirm:
> >
> > MS02-008 (Missing, Red X)
> > MS01-022 (Cannot Confirm, Yellow X)
> > MS02-053 (Cannot Confirm, Yellow X)
> >
> > I also tried to use the hfnetchk tool to vertify the above hotfixes.
> > However, it tells me to refer to Q306460 for a detailed explanation.
> >
> > So, my question is ... Did I really apply the patches to my system? Or,
> the
> > way I apply the patches is not correct.
> >
> > Any help would be greatly appreciate.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages