Re: Good Secure FTP Server
From: FN (newsgroupYESDELETETHISaccount@DELETECAPSyahoo.com)
Date: 10/19/02
- Next message: Richard Dao: "Re: Cookies"
- Previous message: Chris: "RE: Couldn't Create Certificate Request"
- In reply to: Fred Yarbrough: "Good Secure FTP Server"
- Next in thread: Karl Levinson [x y] MVP: "Re: Good Secure FTP Server"
- Reply: Karl Levinson [x y] MVP: "Re: Good Secure FTP Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "FN" <newsgroupYESDELETETHISaccount@DELETECAPSyahoo.com> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:56:49 GMT
w2k server will probably suffice. it has been around long enough to have
most security issues addressed AND you can set the licensing to work by # of
simultaneous users. So you can have 1000 user accounts, but the server will
only allow 10 at one time.
If you use w2k, set the security on the folder; many people think the IIS
plug in does security for them but it does not, despite references to things
like site administrators.
"Fred Yarbrough" <fyarbrou@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:epN5s9tdCHA.1596@tkmsftngp10...
> Hello,
> We are looking to implement a secure FTP server and I am wondering
what
> everyone else is using? Ideally, I would like a product that uses a per
> server licensing agreement vs a per user. It can run on Windows or Unix.
>
>
> Thanks,
> fred
>
>
- Next message: Richard Dao: "Re: Cookies"
- Previous message: Chris: "RE: Couldn't Create Certificate Request"
- In reply to: Fred Yarbrough: "Good Secure FTP Server"
- Next in thread: Karl Levinson [x y] MVP: "Re: Good Secure FTP Server"
- Reply: Karl Levinson [x y] MVP: "Re: Good Secure FTP Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
