Re: NTFS Permissions

From: IT Community (it-community@microsoft.com)
Date: 06/02/02


From: it-community@microsoft.com (IT Community)
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 13:36:52 GMT


 1.
| If I go back to the Virtual Directory Security and use Basic
Authentication
| (specifying the domain after typing EDIT) instead of Windows Integrated
| Authentication, then I only get a two line prompt, logically, and the
| EXECUTIVE can log in with just their username and password.
|
| What the hell is going in with this Windows Integrated authentication?

Integrated Windows, i.e. NTLM or NT Challenge/Response, has a limitation
when authenticated through a proxy or firewall. Please review
Q198116 Authentication Options and Limitations Using Proxy Server 2.0
<http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q198116>

2.
| But if you're logged into a workstation machine as a LOCAL
| USER, and the 3-line security login-pops up...you can log in.
 
This is due to log on locally right is needed. Please review
Q187506 List of NTFS Permissions Required for IIS Site to Work
<http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q187506>

3.
| I experimented with the Anonymous User I'm using (which is a domain
| Anonymous user), making it a member of the EXEC group, etc. That doesn't
| work.

Notice a domain or a local account is used for anonymous access. Please
review:
Q183722 Password Synchronization and Local User Accounts Information
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q183722

This posting is provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no rights.
You assume all risk for your use. © 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights
reserved.

Cumulative Patch for Internet Information Services (Q319733) released
04/10/2002
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms02-018.asp

--------------------
| From: "Brian Boynton" <bboynton3@hotmail.com>
| References: <uspxl9yBCHA.1360@tkmsftngp05>
| Subject: Re: NTFS Permissions
| Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:02:20 -0400
| Lines: 52
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
| Message-ID: <OweZqu$BCHA.2656@tkmsftngp05>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security
| NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.106.140.148
| Path: cpmsftngxa07!tkmsftngxs02!tkmsftngp01!tkmsftngp05
| Xref: cpmsftngxa07 microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security:7226
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security
|
|
|
| Hello,
| I have a basic question about permissions for an Intranet page I'm
setting
| up.
|
| The intranet page we're setting up will have links to various department
| pages. For the sake of an example, let's say I want to restrict access
to
| the EXEC page to the EXEC group. The easiest way to go about this would
be
| to use the NTFS Security Tab on the Folder itself. The EXEC group now
has
| Read/Write permissions to that folder within Inetpub
| (c:\inetpub\intranet_site\Exec).
|
| All of this time I've enabled the anonymous user login usage for the
| Intranet Virtual Directory. However, if I use Windows Integrated
| Authentication, I get a three-line login prompt, when trying to gain
| access,
| which no EXECUTIVE, after using their login, password, and domain
| specification as instructed, can get past. (the dialog prompt just
repeats
| three times and I get the unauthorized page message)
|
| If I apply DOMAIN USERS to the NTFS permissions for the EXEC folder, THEN
| EVERYONE can get in. So at least I can get access to the page, but now
| EVERYONE has access.
|
| If I go back to the Virtual Directory Security and use Basic
Authentication
| (specifying the domain after typing EDIT) instead of Windows Integrated
| Authentication, then I only get a two line prompt, logically, and the
| EXECUTIVE can log in with just their username and password.
|
| What the hell is going in with this Windows Integrated authentication?
|
| Other things I've noticed with Windows Integrated authentication...is if
| You're logged into the domain ALREADY, and a 3-line dialog box pops up,
it
| never works. But if you're logged into a workstation machine as a LOCAL
| USER, and the 3-line security login-pops up...you can log in.
|
| I experimented with the Anonymous User I'm using (which is a domain
| Anonymous user), making it a member of the EXEC group, etc. That doesn't
| work.
|
| Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
|
| At this point I'm happy with the Basic Authentication, but I'd prefer a
| functioning transparent login for users. (plus something that's a
little
| more secure, even though this is an intranet page)
| Thanks,
|
| Brian
|
|
|
|



Relevant Pages

  • Re: NTFS Permissions
    ... I have a basic question about permissions for an Intranet page I'm setting ... the EXEC page to the EXEC group. ... All of this time I've enabled the anonymous user login usage for the ... If I go back to the Virtual Directory Security and use Basic Authentication ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
  • Re: 70-290, internet authentication mode
    ... >> to access the resource. ... >> anonymous user with a password, digest authentication, and basic ... >> in order to avoid the prompt. ...
    (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)
  • Re: 70-290, internet authentication mode
    ... > to access the resource. ... > anonymous user with a password, digest authentication, and basic ... > in order to avoid the prompt. ...
    (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)
  • Re: Authorizing Anonymous User - IIS6/.NET
    ... use that to set the thread's principal, the authentication started to work. ... Anonymous access only using user account with network ... >> Is there anyway to force authentication of the Anonymous user? ... >> anonymous user is a network account with the required permissions. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • 70-290, internet authentication mode
    ... >the question asked what authentication mode was needed ... resource, does not get ... >order to avoid the prompt. ... >cause a prompt would be if the anonymous user is not ...
    (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)