Re: System.Security.SecurityException was unhandled

This is not a server-level issue. Instead, it's caused by the CAS
permission grant on the client machine, which will be more restricted when
running from a network location than from the local machine. (See
http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2003/06/20/57023.aspx for details.)
Given the particular exception description you've posted, my first guess
would be that one of your DLLs might contain unverifiable or unsafe code and
that the permission that's failing is a SecurityPermission\SkipVerification.
Otherwise, a link demand might be the culprit, and you may be able to gather
more information about the exception by moving the body of your current Main
method into a new method. e.g.:

private static void Main(string[] args)
{
MainHelper(args);
}

private static void MainHelper(string[] args)
{
// Everything from your original Main method goes here.
}


"Seok Bee" <seokbee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0BECDFFE-3E7C-40F9-BCB8-E64177A546A6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Experts,

I've created a Console application to perform a checking of an Excel file.
During development using vb.net in Visual Studio 2005, the application is
running fine. I can get my expected result. Then I move the executable
files
and related *.dll files into a server to schedule for execution. The
server
is running on Windows 2000 sp4 and installed with .NET Frameword 1.1 and
2.0.
When I execute the application I received and error message. The error is
as
follow shown in the debugger:

System.Security.SecurityException was unhandled
Message="System.Security.Permissions.SecurityPermission"
Source="SPQAutomation"
StackTrace:
at SPQAutomation.SPQAutomation.Main()


While, from the Application log in Event Viewver I have the following
error:

Event Type: Error
Event Source: .NET Runtime 2.0 Error Reporting
Event Category: None
Event ID: 5000
Date: 15-Feb-06
Time: 6:57:51 PM
User: N/A
Computer: IT3
Description:
EventType clr20r3, P1 spqautomation.exe, P2 1.0.0.0, P3 43f3058e, P4
spqautomation, P5 1.0.0.0, P6 43f3058e, P7 18, P8 1, P9
system.security.security, P10 NIL.

For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.

May I know, what should I do/configure in the server in order for my
application to be executed?


Many thanks in advance.

Regards,
SB



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: AS2005 x64 vs x86 performance
    ... When you run Profiler against the server do you see any other activity? ... Each execution made one execution unit 100%. ... As soon as the XMLA was executed the queries get answered. ... The disk sys on the xeon srv is a FC SAN where I have an array of 4 FC ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap)
  • Re: Replies to e-mails not received
    ... 07:17:14 Successfully initialized the resource manager ... Retrieving Blob ... server ready.") ...
    (microsoft.public.outlook)
  • Re: AS2005 x64 vs x86 performance
    ... cached data on the 64-bit server is much larger and it the commit operation ... My issues are related with XMLA ... executed one of the execution units goes 100% for some seconds. ... The disk sys on the xeon srv is a FC SAN where I have an array of 4 FC ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap)
  • Asp.Net.Vulnerability: Full Trust (current security problems and possible solutions)
    ... As Long) As Long") is to reduce the website's trust level from 'Full ... of use and rapid development features of Access and SQL server ... execution, disclosure of usernames and system information, etc... ... Have one website per virtual server ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
  • Asp.Net.Vulnerability: Full Trust (current security problems and possible solutions)
    ... As Long) As Long") is to reduce the website's trust level from 'Full ... of use and rapid development features of Access and SQL server ... execution, disclosure of usernames and system information, etc... ... Have one website per virtual server ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.security)
Quantcast