Re: .NET 2.0 Membership "role context"
From: William Stacey [MVP] (staceywREMOVE_at_mvps.org)
Date: 07/16/05
- Previous message: William Stacey [MVP]: "Re: .NET 2.0 Membership "role context""
- In reply to: William Stacey [MVP]: "Re: .NET 2.0 Membership "role context""
- Next in thread: danielroot: "Re: .NET 2.0 Membership "role context""
- Reply: danielroot: "Re: .NET 2.0 Membership "role context""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:52:50 -0400
Also note, in this example, there really is no hierarchy. Your either a
member of the required group or you are not. So it is flat.
-- William Stacey [MVP]
- Previous message: William Stacey [MVP]: "Re: .NET 2.0 Membership "role context""
- In reply to: William Stacey [MVP]: "Re: .NET 2.0 Membership "role context""
- Next in thread: danielroot: "Re: .NET 2.0 Membership "role context""
- Reply: danielroot: "Re: .NET 2.0 Membership "role context""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|