Re: error passing byte[] or strings of encrypted data to Web Service

From: Yunus Emre ALPÖZEN [MCSD.NET] (yemre_at_msakademik.net)
Date: 05/30/05

  • Next message: ChuckD_Duncan: "Re: error passing byte[] or strings of encrypted data to Web Ser" 
    Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 20:59:18 +0300

    U are right. Converting Base64 should fix it. To overcome this issue, I
    prefer to implement a class and mark it serializable and embed my data in
    it. Conversion is done automatically. I used this method for secure file
    transfer over SSL in web services. It works perfectly... 

    -- 
Thanks,
Yunus Emre ALPÖZEN
BSc, MCSD.NET
"Dominick Baier [DevelopMentor]" <dbaier@pleasepleasenospamdevelop.com> 
wrote in message news:421237632530493895783323@news.microsoft.com...
> Hello ChuckD_Duncan,
>
> try converting your encrypted strings to Base64 prior to sending
>
> string s = Convert.ToBase64(byte[])
>
> this should be done automatically upon serialization by the proxy 
> infrastructure (what datatype ends up in your wsdl document) ??
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Dominick Baier - DevelopMentor
> http://www.leastprivilege.com
>
>> passing something simple like:
>> bool result = Sample("first", "second");
>> works fine... but when the two args are replaced by encrypted strings,
>> I
>> get the same "object not set to an instance" error message as in the
>> start of this thread.
>>
>> bool result = Sample( szEncryp, szXMLPublicKey);
>>
>> also blows up if the first parm is NOT encrypted at all, just "xyz".
>> The
>> XML string is in fact a well-formed XML:
>> string szXMLPublicString = provider_alg.GetXMLString(false); //
>> and
>> can be viewed and verified as a valid XML string.
>> Help??
>>
>
>
>
  • Next message: ChuckD_Duncan: "Re: error passing byte[] or strings of encrypted data to Web Ser"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Current JSON Proposal in ES4
      ... String.parseJSON <-- should return what, ... Object should not always have data structure functionality. ... also supports a specialized serialization. ... in the face of a growing use of JSON as a data exchange ...
      (comp.lang.javascript)
    • Re: XmlSerializer Collection with Collections
      ... What you can do here is hide the OptionList from serialization as follows: ... > public class TestSerializer ... > public int AddQuestion(Question question) ... > public Question(string QuestionText, string Type, int Score, bool ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.xml)
    • Re: Serializing/Deserializing to Database
      ... into string, such as base64 convertion). ... private void btnDeserialize_Click ... MySavableClass msc = obj as MySavableClass; ... serialization for further reference: ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
    • Re: Compiler executable file c:..v1.1.4322csc.exe cannot be found.
      ... most likely you are using default serialization code and impersonation. ... But as the compiler _IS_ there, I don't see why it does this ... options, String compilerDirectory, String compilerExe, String ... CompilerParameters parameters, Evidence evidence) +478 ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
    • Re: Using Classes as List Items
      ... | serialization has three items for that property, ... | Private _Part1 As String ... | Public Property Part1() As String ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)