Re: Windows Authentication question
From: Natan (nvivo.misc_at_mandic.com.br)
Date: 03/24/05
- Next message: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: IIS "secure communications"and "certificate" sections disabled."
- Previous message: Natan: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- In reply to: Paul Clement: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:49:23 -0300
Paul Clement wrote:
> If you're using domain validation, Forms Authentication isn't really appropriate. Forms
> Authentication is primarily designed for credential verification against a different source, such as
> a database, where you have full control over the authentication process.
>
> I'd recommend you stick with Basic or Integrated Windows if you're authenticating against the
> domain.
Sorry, i said Forms Authentication just because i'm going to use an html
form to get the username and password, but i have no intention to use
the buggy FormsAuthentication.
BTW, problem solved. thanks.
- Next message: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: IIS "secure communications"and "certificate" sections disabled."
- Previous message: Natan: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- In reply to: Paul Clement: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|