Re: Windows Authentication question
From: Natan (nvivo.misc_at_mandic.com.br)
Date: 03/24/05
- Next message: Natan: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Previous message: Paul Clement: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- In reply to: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Next in thread: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Reply: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:46:41 -0300
Nicole Calinoiu wrote:
> If you'll be authenticating against Windows accounts, is there any
> particular reason you don't want to use Windows integrated authentication?
> It tends to be quite a bit more convenient for both users and developers
> and, in general, there's little reason to avoid it unless you must support
> users without Windows accounts (in which case it's generally "polite" to
> support mixed authentication schemes so that Windows users can still use the
> more convenient login mechanism).
I solved it using System.DirectoryServices. =)
About the reasons, first because we want the user to be able to login
with his username when there is no windows authentication, second, we
don't want an user to have access to our intranet just because a
computer is turned on.
Thanks...
BTW: answering a post just to ask why someone is doing that is annoying.
Comments are welcome, but answer the question first then make your comment.
- Next message: Natan: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Previous message: Paul Clement: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- In reply to: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Next in thread: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Reply: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: Windows Authentication question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|