Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection
From: Paul Hatcher (phatcher_at_spamless.cix.co.uk)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: Shawn Farkas [MS]: "Re: API to access loaded assembly hash"
- Previous message: Joe Kaplan \(MVP - ADSI\): "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- In reply to: Joe Kaplan \(MVP - ADSI\): "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- Next in thread: Shawn Farkas [MS]: "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- Reply: Shawn Farkas [MS]: "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- Reply: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:54:08 -0000
Is this correct...
1. Assert the Reflection permission declaratively in the code.
a.. Place the assembly in the GAC
or
b. Modify the web_mediumtrust.config to grant Assertion and Reflect
permission based on the strong name
Paul
"Joe Kaplan (MVP - ADSI)" <joseph.e.kaplan@removethis.accenture.com> wrote
in message news:#VfQqN5GFHA.3272@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> That's pretty much what I thought. I wasn't sure if the code he was
calling
> that demanded the Reflection permission did a full demand or not, so I
> thought he should probably know about Assert as well, just in case.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Joe K.
>
> "Nicole Calinoiu" <calinoiu REMOVETHIS AT gmail DOT com> wrote in message
> news:%23zmyks4GFHA.576@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > Depends on whether the code that's being called makes a link demand or
> > full demand. If it's a full demand, then an assertion will be required,
> > but assertion permission can be acquired by the same means as reflection
> > permission.
> >
> >
> > "Joe Kaplan (MVP - ADSI)" <joseph.e.kaplan@removethis.accenture.com>
wrote
> > in message news:%231XfeZ4GFHA.3088@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> Won't he need to assert the permissions he's using to if he wants to
> >> prevent a stack walk? That would apply in either situation (GAC or
> >> non-GAC) if his assembly had permissions that the rest of the
application
> >> did not by default, right?
> >>
> >> Joe K.
> >>
> >> "Nicole Calinoiu" <calinoiu REMOVETHIS AT gmail DOT com> wrote in
message
> >> news:u3y8$I4GFHA.3352@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >>> Have you tried adding it to the GAC? Did it work? If so, would you
> >>> stiff
> >>> prefer an alternate approach? For example, you might try to alter the
> >>> web_mediumtrust.config to grant additional permissions to your
assembly
> >>> based on its
> >>> strong name.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Paul Hatcher" <phatcher@spamless.cix.co.uk> wrote in message
> >>> news:Oy8Y4M1GFHA.2744@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >>>> Is there any way of granting a specific assembly Reflection
permission
> >>>> when
> >>>> the web server is set to Medium level trust? The assembly is signed
> >>>> and
> >>>> may
> >>>> be placed in the GAC if necessary
> >>>>
> >>>> Paul
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Shawn Farkas [MS]: "Re: API to access loaded assembly hash"
- Previous message: Joe Kaplan \(MVP - ADSI\): "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- In reply to: Joe Kaplan \(MVP - ADSI\): "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- Next in thread: Shawn Farkas [MS]: "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- Reply: Shawn Farkas [MS]: "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- Reply: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: Medium Level Trust and Reflection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|