RE: Permissions Questions

savanted1_at_hotmail.com
Date: 01/26/05 

Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:09:03 -0800

Dear, Mr. Farkas
       I want to thank you personally for enlightening me on the subject
matter of CAS. I f I have anymore questions on this matter I will not
hesitate to post it here within the group.

Regards,

""Shawn Farkas [MS]"" wrote:

> The CAS security model does not fit in anywhere on the OSI stack. The DNS
> permission you're referring to actually only determines if an application
> is allowed to resolve DNS addresses, it doesn't have anything to do with
> the actual DNS resolution itself. CAS permissions actually sit on top of
> NT permissions as well.
> (http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2004/12/15/315992.aspx for more
> information on that). In fact, an application that runs in the CLR and
> uses the CAS system may never access the network at all!
>
> -Shawn
> http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
> Note:
> For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this message
> are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they originated.
> --------------------
> > Thread-Topic: Permissions Questions
> > thread-index: AcUDDAb3Lu8C7z6lQoCkQa5qaeNVPw==
> > X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 208.248.162.220
> > From: =?Utf-8?B?c2F2YW50ZWQxQGhvdG1haWwuY29t?=
> <savanted1hotmailcom@discussions.microsoft.com>
> > Subject: Permissions Questions
> > Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:31:04 -0800
> > Lines: 8
> > Message-ID: <63641FB6-D17A-47DC-92BA-7ED717267EDE@microsoft.com>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="Utf-8"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> > Importance: normal
> > Priority: normal
> > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> > Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.security
> > NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.1.29
> > Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> > Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.security:8840
> > X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.security
> >
> > Dear, Microsoft Corporation
> >
> > Would the Permissions architecture be considered to operate at the
> Session
> > Layer of the OSI model? The reason I state this is due in part to the
> fact
> > that it has DNS incorporated within its confines.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How to rm a symbolic link?
    ... Bing-Feng Wang wrote: ... The permissions you have on a file you are trying to delete ... won't matter. ... Regards, ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: .NET CAS vs OS security
    ... CAS won't come into play if your assembly is installed on the local file ... absolutely no interaction between CAS permissions and OS permissions. ... is layered over the top of the OS security and they are based on two totally ... Co-author of "The .NET Developer's Guide to Directory Services Programming" ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)
  • Re: .NET CAS vs OS security
    ... I was catching the SecurityException and the Exception. ... CAS won't come into play if your assembly is installed on the local file ... absolutely no interaction between CAS permissions and OS permissions. ... is layered over the top of the OS security and they are based on two totally ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)
  • Re: My own security subsystem
    ... will look in the permissions table and match the sql login with the ... 'permissions' in the profile, and if the query returns a value such as 2, ... Best Regards, ... except for the fact that I can't use NT domain groups. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.security)
  • Re: Limiting exe permissions
    ... This will not require running the installer. ... The average Joe won't know or understand anything about CAS either. ... > browse for files where the user has permissions, ... In order to apply application-specific restrictions via CAS policy, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)