Re: sn.exe -Vr assembly
From: Gecko (nada_at_nada.com)
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: Shawn Farkas [MS]: "Re: CSP and Strong Name Key"
- Previous message: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: sn.exe -Vr assembly"
- In reply to: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: sn.exe -Vr assembly"
- Next in thread: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: sn.exe -Vr assembly"
- Reply: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: sn.exe -Vr assembly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:48:46 -0600
>What exactly is the goal of your "strong name security scenario"? If you
>provide some more details, perhaps someone could suggest an alternate
>approach.
I don't really have any security goal right now. All I am doing is reading a
book about security to get educated.
I am currently in the process of developing a Windows application that is
intended to run in home computers so you can forget about trying to rely on
the users logging as restricted users and protect my assemblies that way,
heck, as far as I know, the users of the application themselves may want to
tamper with my files to just to piss me off!!
At the end, the whole idea is to be able to distribute an exe and a dll to
my users that can't be tampered with by some hacker or by them. The
application uses remoting to communicate with the server and I think there
is some integrity checking that goes on there but I am still trying to
figure all this out.
Problem is that I am getting at the end of my book and now have more
questions than before!! Damn, I should had taken that porn star job I was
offered a couple of years ago instead of going for programming!
- Next message: Shawn Farkas [MS]: "Re: CSP and Strong Name Key"
- Previous message: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: sn.exe -Vr assembly"
- In reply to: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: sn.exe -Vr assembly"
- Next in thread: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: sn.exe -Vr assembly"
- Reply: Nicole Calinoiu: "Re: sn.exe -Vr assembly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|