Re: SQL Injection Prevention
From: Aaron [SQL Server MVP] (ten.xoc_at_dnartreb.noraa)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: SQL Injection Prevention"
- Previous message: Clint: "Impersonation and SQL Connections"
- In reply to: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: SQL Injection Prevention"
- Next in thread: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: SQL Injection Prevention"
- Reply: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: SQL Injection Prevention"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:50:23 -0400
> Therefore my statement stays that parameterized SQL select
> (insert/update/delete) actually provides better protection against SQL
> injection than parameterized call to stored procedure.
I'm not sure I understand where you've proven that parameterized DML
statements are better than parameterized stored procedure calls.
-- http://www.aspfaq.com/ (Reverse address to reply.)
- Next message: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: SQL Injection Prevention"
- Previous message: Clint: "Impersonation and SQL Connections"
- In reply to: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: SQL Injection Prevention"
- Next in thread: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: SQL Injection Prevention"
- Reply: Valery Pryamikov: "Re: SQL Injection Prevention"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading