Re: CAS -Security
From: Mary Chipman (mchip_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/05/04
- Next message: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Protect IL Code"
- Previous message: /kim/birkelund/aka/sekhmet: "Re: Permissions granted based on assembly and user"
- In reply to: Srini: "Re: CAS -Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:36:03 -0400
It depends on your application, and how you want to authorize users to
access secured resources. Role-based security and CAS are two
different things. If a user doesn't have permissions to run code or
access a resource, then CAS doesn't come into play since the code
isn't going to load.
--Mary
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 15:49:01 -0700, "Srini"
<Srini@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>The way I am looking at the CAS is that it can be used to provide access control. And I have the other option, Rolebased security, to provide the same. If I use the later, do I have to do anything with CAS also?
- Next message: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Protect IL Code"
- Previous message: /kim/birkelund/aka/sekhmet: "Re: Permissions granted based on assembly and user"
- In reply to: Srini: "Re: CAS -Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]