Re: Obfuscation
From: Henning Krause (newsgroup.no_at_spam.infinitec.de)
Date: 05/30/04
- Previous message: Adam: "Re: Obfuscation"
- In reply to: Adam: "Re: Obfuscation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 12:08:09 +0200
Hello,
the makers of Salamander also claim to have an unbreakable obfuscator,
because it compiles .NET programs into native i386 instructions, thus making
it impossible to revert it back to a high-level .NET language.
Greetings,
Henning Krause
==========================
Visit my website: http://www.infinitec.de
Try my free Exchange Explorer: Mistaya
(http://www.infinitec.de/?page=products)
"Adam" <adam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:efOUnbiREHA.1564@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> I settled on Xenocode (http://www.xenocode.com/en/) - after trying 5
> products - because it seemed to produce the best (most difficult to
> comprehend) obfuscated code (though it didn't necessarily have the best
> feature set). However, *always* keep in mind that the Salamander
Decompiler
> (http://www.remotesoft.com/salamander/index.html) will decompile pretty
much
> anything into quite high level (i.e. readable) code. I'd advice you to
spend
> your money wisely - the dearest isn't necessarily any more 'secure' than
the
> others!
>
> "D" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:12f6501c4436e$e5121e90$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> > We are looking to purchase an obfuscation package for
> > our .NET application. The free version distributed with
> > Visual Studio .NET does not offer all the features we
> > require.
> >
> > I was curious to see what other people are using and what
> > sort of results they have experienced. Any feedback on
> > this would be much appreciated.
> >
> > D
>
>
- Previous message: Adam: "Re: Obfuscation"
- In reply to: Adam: "Re: Obfuscation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
