RE: Security makes .Net a JOKE.....
From: Herbert (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/25/04
- Next message: surya: "How to determine what permissions are required for an assembly"
- Previous message: Ollie: "Re: How can I tell waht permissions an assembly requires?"
- In reply to: Earth Worm Jim: "Security makes .Net a JOKE....."
- Next in thread: Sherif ElMetainy: "Re: Security makes .Net a JOKE....."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 03:01:09 -0800
The online documentation for
a) security classes and
b) software licensing (LicenseManager & co.)
are incomplete, erroneous, goofy and misleading. The classes themselves are coded excellent!
Given the importance of both themes to serious developers, I can't understand why there is no improvement in documentation since the introduction of .NET.
This is especially important because these themes are almost not covered in .NET books.
On the other side: why are there so few entries in the related newsgroups, gotdotnet.com, ... ?
Do serious developers not use .NET :-)) ? Is Java that better?
herbert
- Next message: surya: "How to determine what permissions are required for an assembly"
- Previous message: Ollie: "Re: How can I tell waht permissions an assembly requires?"
- In reply to: Earth Worm Jim: "Security makes .Net a JOKE....."
- Next in thread: Sherif ElMetainy: "Re: Security makes .Net a JOKE....."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]