Re: Java can do it ... why not .NET ?
From: Crirus (Crirus_at_datagroup.ro)
Date: 02/03/04
- Next message: Crirus: "Re: Framework 1.1 security questions"
- Previous message: Crirus: "Re: Framework 1.1 security questions"
- In reply to: Shawn Farkas: "Re: Java can do it ... why not .NET ?"
- Next in thread: Shawn Farkas: "Re: Java can do it ... why not .NET ?"
- Reply: Shawn Farkas: "Re: Java can do it ... why not .NET ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:00:36 +0200
I allready connected, I implemented all that... I'm testing the app in
internet/intranet and I need to know if it work with defaults groups
policies and if the code is assigned by default to right group code, "same
site"
--
Cheers,
Crirus
------------------------------
If work were a good thing, the boss would take it all from you
------------------------------
""Shawn Farkas"" <shawnfa@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:zQRf4Jf6DHA.1988@cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl...
> Cirius,
>
> In order to connect back to your server, you need to use the
HttpWebRequest class ... this can be created by calling
> System.Net.WebRequest.Create() with the URI you need to connect to. Have
you tried specifying the port you need to connect back to in this
> constructor?
>
> -Shawn
> http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa
>
> --
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this
message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they
> originated.
> --------------------
> >Reply-To: "Crirus" <Crirus@datagroup.ro>
> >From: "Crirus" <Crirus@datagroup.ro>
> >References: <u3Fj#qd5DHA.2056@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
> >Subject: Re: Java can do it ... why not .NET ?
> >Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:23:02 +0200
> >Lines: 45
> >Organization: DGI
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> >Message-ID: <udxao4W6DHA.3804@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.security
> >NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.datagroup.ro 193.230.233.253
> >Path:
cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl!cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!cpmsftngxa09.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.
phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
> >Xref: cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.security:4728
> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.security
> >
> >My issue exactly but with http on port 80 connection
> >I cant be sure, but seems that any connection to a server request
> >WebPermission in order to accomplish...
> >Bad enough for the ones that need connections only to download server.
> >I dont want to hack my own server, so seems quite odd to protect against
> >myself...
> >
> >Can you let me know about any improvements you will find in this case?
> >
> >thanks
> >--
> >Cheers,
> > Crirus
> >
> >------------------------------
> >If work were a good thing, the boss would take it all from you
> >
> >------------------------------
> >
> >"Simon Green" <simon@intesoft.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:u3Fj%23qd5DHA.2056@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> I have a C# control that I want to embed in IE which need to connect
back
> >to
> >> the host server using sockets (TcpClient) to display a status image.
> >>
> >> The security in Java Applets only allow connections back to the same
> >server
> >> and I imagined that .NET was the same with the "..._Same_Site_Access"
code
> >> groups.
> >>
> >> Alas, it doesn't seem to be the case :(
> >>
> >> Is there any way to make a socket connection that will work on a
default
> >> install?
> >>
> >> I guess using the J# classes may work (as these copy Java) but then it
> >means
> >> the J# runtime is needed and J# browser controls seem even worse
(another
> >> runtime and popup warning asking if it can run).
> >>
> >> - Simon Green
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Crirus: "Re: Framework 1.1 security questions"
- Previous message: Crirus: "Re: Framework 1.1 security questions"
- In reply to: Shawn Farkas: "Re: Java can do it ... why not .NET ?"
- Next in thread: Shawn Farkas: "Re: Java can do it ... why not .NET ?"
- Reply: Shawn Farkas: "Re: Java can do it ... why not .NET ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|