Re: CAS and granted permission
From: Michel Gallant (neutron_at_istar.ca)
Date: 09/11/03
- Next message: Ed: "Re: CAS and granted permission"
- Previous message: Andy Newland: "VB.net apps from a non trusted network"
- In reply to: Ed: "CAS and granted permission"
- Next in thread: Ed: "Re: CAS and granted permission"
- Reply: Ed: "Re: CAS and granted permission"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:29:33 -0400
Code groups work by a "union" process so if you set
up a custom code group, with "AllCode" membership
condition, then any managed code run which matches
your assembly "Membership Condition" will have **at
least** the permissions you have defined for your custom
permission set "TestSet".
Usually StrongName is a *Membership Condition* specifier,
and it isn't clear from your posting why you configure
a permission set with "StrongNameIdentityPermission", unless
you actually mean that that is the Membership Condition for your
code-group.
- Michel Gallant
MVP Security
"Ed" <Sergeev@SoftLab.ru> wrote in message news:15c201c37854$dfda5680$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> Greetings!
> How does .NET Security work in such situation:
> I created new permission set "TestSet" which include only
> one permission: StrongNameIdentityPermission with some
> PublicKeyBlob, created new code group with membership
> conditions "AllCode" and granted permission "TestSet".
> Will any executing code be granted this
> StrongNameIdentityPermission now or the permission of such
> type (created implicitly by framework from StrongName
> evidence) can't be granted this way?
> Thanks!
- Next message: Ed: "Re: CAS and granted permission"
- Previous message: Andy Newland: "VB.net apps from a non trusted network"
- In reply to: Ed: "CAS and granted permission"
- Next in thread: Ed: "Re: CAS and granted permission"
- Reply: Ed: "Re: CAS and granted permission"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|