Re: Signing effects
From: Andreas Claudi (ask@and_i_will_tell.com)
Date: 03/28/03
- Previous message: David Wang [Msft]: "Re: URGENT... mixed anonymous and integrated security issue"
- In reply to: Michel Gallant \(MVP\): "Re: Signing effects"
- Next in thread: Ramiro Calderon Romero: "Re: Signing effects"
- Reply: Ramiro Calderon Romero: "Re: Signing effects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Andreas Claudi <ask@and_i_will_tell.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 00:00:52 -0800
I have a service in assembly S.
This service makes use of a LicenceChecker module L - also in a seperate
assembly.
L is signed and S references it.
If I make a clean build there is no problem, but if I rebuild L alone and
copy it to the run directory of S, I get a 'does not match manifest'-etc.
exception when starting S.
My primary concern is to ensure that
a) S is not changed to remove the call to L's verification method
b) L is not changed to just return true
Can this be achieved by signing both assemblies?
In my understanding, this is not enough. Possibly Link Demand is the
answer?
- Previous message: David Wang [Msft]: "Re: URGENT... mixed anonymous and integrated security issue"
- In reply to: Michel Gallant \(MVP\): "Re: Signing effects"
- Next in thread: Ramiro Calderon Romero: "Re: Signing effects"
- Reply: Ramiro Calderon Romero: "Re: Signing effects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|