assert permissions
From: Lilleman (Lilleman@mbox309.swipnet.se)
Date: 01/28/03
- Next message: assafwo: "Security exeption using .Net 2003 beta 7.1"
- Previous message: Yury Zenkevich: "Re: EventLog from remote computer"
- Next in thread: Sebastian Lange [MS]: "Re: assert permissions"
- Reply: Sebastian Lange [MS]: "Re: assert permissions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Lilleman" <Lilleman@mbox309.swipnet.se> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 13:11:51 +0100
The dotNet framework has some abilities to assert permissions. I understand
the technical use of assertion, but why has Microsoft chosen to solve the
problem this way? With asserting as
an option, the whole code security model is jeopardized. It feels like
the assert option is a risky compromise between a security architecture
and user friendliness and options to developers.
Is it possible to encrypt the information that is sent between manage and
unmanaged code?
- Next message: assafwo: "Security exeption using .Net 2003 beta 7.1"
- Previous message: Yury Zenkevich: "Re: EventLog from remote computer"
- Next in thread: Sebastian Lange [MS]: "Re: assert permissions"
- Reply: Sebastian Lange [MS]: "Re: assert permissions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]