Re: Declarative or Imperative Security
From: Diego Parolin (diegoMatrix@bedin.it)
Date: 01/24/03
- Next message: AJoshi: "Re: Rijndael class, Padding bug?, Ivan Medvedev"
- Previous message: Mike Timms: "Re: MAPI exchange security work around"
- In reply to: Ivan Medvedev [MS]: "Re: Declarative or Imperative Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Diego Parolin" <diegoMatrix@bedin.it> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:41:54 +0100
thanks Ivan,
Diego
-- If you want contact me directly, please remove "Matrix" "Ivan Medvedev [MS]" <ivanmed@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:eUKg$AzwCHA.2528@TK2MSFTNGP09... > Diego - > it is not a question of better or worse, each method works fine and there > are scenarios that one method is more suitable for than another. Some > highlights: with the imperative approach one can construct permission > objects dynamically at the run time (with declarative you have to know what > the permission should be when writing the code, not always convenient for > FileIOPermission and such), there are actions (LinkDemand, > InheritanceDemand) that can only be done declaratively, declarative > attributes can be read and processed by code analisys tools, for example > PermView or FxCop (the imperative security is not so easy to read/process). > > Hope this helps. > --Ivan > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > "Diego Parolin" <diegoMatrix@bedin.it> wrote in message > news:ORD2WeswCHA.2600@TK2MSFTNGP11... > > In your opinion, what is the better? > > > > TIA, > > Diego Parolin > > > > -- > > If you want contact me directly, please remove "Matrix" > > > > > >
- Next message: AJoshi: "Re: Rijndael class, Padding bug?, Ivan Medvedev"
- Previous message: Mike Timms: "Re: MAPI exchange security work around"
- In reply to: Ivan Medvedev [MS]: "Re: Declarative or Imperative Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]