Re: Best Practices and script/executable directories
- From: "Jason" <job2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:39:44 +0100
Thanks for your reply Walter.
As I said, I've never come across this before so I don't really know much
about the rational. There's quite a chain to travel along to get any further
info as I'm not directly talking to our customer so I thought I'd try here
and see if someone had any experience of this. However, it was in a
security requirements doc, so the customer is probably thinking the bin or
scripts directories getting compromised if accessable through the root url.
Not being that deep a security expect myself, the bin directory seems secure
to me. And we have no server-side scripts.
Thanks for reminding me about the GAC. We'll have to wait to see what
exactly the customer wants.
Cheers,
Jason.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Best Practices and script/executable directories
- From: "Walter Wang [MSFT]"
- Re: Best Practices and script/executable directories
- References:
- Best Practices and script/executable directories
- From: Jason
- RE: Best Practices and script/executable directories
- From: "Walter Wang [MSFT]"
- Best Practices and script/executable directories
- Prev by Date: Re: HTTP Digest Authentication against Windows account
- Next by Date: Re: Best Practices and script/executable directories
- Previous by thread: RE: Best Practices and script/executable directories
- Next by thread: Re: Best Practices and script/executable directories
- Index(es):