Re: X.509 Certificate based authentication
- From: gudujarlson@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 23 May 2007 11:32:09 -0700
On May 23, 12:24 pm, "Joe Kaplan"
<joseph.e.kap...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FWIW, there isn't really anything to have issue over with the actual
implementation. It is just straight stock SSL with client certificate
authentication. It will interoperate with other platforms that also use SSL
client certificate authentication, as there is nothing proprietary here.
You are limited in the algorithms that your MS operating system will use for
the symmetric portion of the encryption and you have to work with
Microsoft's approach to certificate and key stores as opposed to something
like OpenSSL key stores, but the implementation of the algorithms are based
on the standards.
Ah, maybe that is one of my key disconnects. I did not know that
"client certificate authentication" is something defined in the SSL
standard. Maybe I should be googling for SSL info.
.
- References:
- Re: X.509 Certificate based authentication
- From: Joe Kaplan
- Re: X.509 Certificate based authentication
- Prev by Date: Re: X.509 Certificate based authentication
- Next by Date: Re: Windows authentication with custom user store
- Previous by thread: Re: X.509 Certificate based authentication
- Next by thread: Re: X.509 Certificate based authentication
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|