Re: Active Directory
- From: Bob Mixon <bob.mixon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:20:34 +0000 (UTC)
Greetings Joe,
I really appreciate all of the information. I am going to go ahead and purchase your book. I didn't really want to have to go through all of this but I don't see any way around it. :)
In the meantime I have a couple of additional questions. When I am specifying the user name (CN), is it the user name or account name?
Thank you again and I will keep you posted on my progress!
Bob Mixon [Microsoft SharePoint MVP]
http://www.ShareSquared.com
http://www.ShareSquared.com/blogs/BobMixon
Hi Bob,
There is no way those paths you have are going to be working
correctly.
LDAP distinguished names (DN) are similar to file system paths in that
they
suggest the directory hierarchy, but with three key differences:
- They are listed in opposite order (most specific first instead of
last
like a file system path)
- Each component in the hierarchy has a two part name called a
relative
distinguished name (RDN) that is made up of the naming attribute and
value.
For example, CN=someuser could be an RDN where CN is the naming
attribute
and someuser is the value of CN for that object. AD uses just three
naming
attributes: CN, OU and DC, although LDAP in general can be much more
varied.
- The top level object in the hierarchy (called the naming context
name or
domain root in some cases) may consist of more than one RDN component.
For
example, you might have the NC name as DC=domain,DC=com.
As such, a typical DN for a user might be
CN=someuser,CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com. Here, CN=someuser points to
the user object, CN=Users points to the default container in AD where
users are stored and DC=domain,DC=com points to the domain root.
Now, with an ADsPath (which is used by ADSI and
System.DirectoryServices), the path is a combo of the provider, the
server (which can be optional) and the object name. It goes like:
<provider>://<server>/<object>
In LDAP, the provider is always "LDAP" (upper case is important)
unless you are talking to the global catalog, in which it is GC. The
server name is optional and can be the DNS name of the DC, the DNS
name of the domain, the NetBIOS name of the domain or the IP address
of the DC. I generally recommend using either the DNS name of the
domain or nothing (called "serverless binding" in ADSI terms).
However, when you use nothing, ADSI uses the current security context
of the thread to figure out what domain to contact and this can get
complex in web apps, so you can get unexpected failures this way.
Adding the domain name is safe. The object name is the distinguished
name of the object. As such, a valid ADsPath for the DN of the
example object above might be:
LDAP://domain.com/CN=someuser,CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com
or
LDAP://mydc.domain.com/CN=someuser,CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com
or
LDAP://CN=someuser,CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com
Remember that with S.DS, the constructor doesn't actually bind the
object (it is late binding), so you'll generally get an object back
when you use the constructor. It will just fail later when you
attempt to use it. This is a little different than ADSI in VB or
VBScript.
My recommendation would be to pick up Marc's browser that he wrote
(good sample code inside) or just get LDP.exe which comes with ADAM or
the Windows adminpack. I like it especially, as it is sort of the
"query analyzer" for LDAP. It kind of forces you to know what you are
doing, but it also shows you exactly what is going and and can really
help you prototype your queries.
My book (that Marc aluded to) has a bunch of other helpful stuff. You
may run into issues related to security context when you move this
into production and have everything on different boxes. It is very
much like getting SSPI auth to work with a remote SQL server. You
need to understand security context and delegation quite well,
especially if you are using impersonation and want to connect to AD as
the authenticated user instead of the app pool process identity.
LDAP can be an annoying struggle for those seeing it for the first
time, even for experienced devs like you, but it all comes together
once you get a few things down.
Joe K.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Active Directory
- From: Marc Scheuner
- Re: Active Directory
- From: Joe Kaplan
- Re: Active Directory
- References:
- Re: Active Directory
- From: Joe Kaplan
- Re: Active Directory
- Prev by Date: Re: Conditional Authentication / Authorization Approach
- Next by Date: Re: Active Directory
- Previous by thread: Re: Active Directory
- Next by thread: Re: Active Directory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
