Re: AzMan Still the way to go?
- From: Dominick Baier <dbaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:55:44 +0000 (UTC)
If it is an intranet app i would def. go for integrated auth. This is the most powerful option...
I don't like membership. For roles you can still add app defined roles to your users...
---
Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor
http://www.leastprivilege.com
Stefan is the man. He was one of the key guys on membership.
Your approach sounds reasonable. If provisioning the roles in SQL
becoms a problem due to the need to keep AD and SQL in sync in order
to associate users with roles, you might also consider using AD group
membership for roles. You can also just use Windows authentication in
IIS instead of the AD membership provider if you don't need
forms-based authentication for your application. That depends a lot
on what the deployment model is, whether you can use IWA to get SSO,
the look and feel you want, etc. If you can avoid using forms auth
and the membership provider, I would.
Best of luck!
Joe K.
.
- References:
- Re: AzMan Still the way to go?
- From: Joe Kaplan
- Re: AzMan Still the way to go?
- Prev by Date: Re: AzMan Still the way to go?
- Next by Date: Re: AzMan Still the way to go?
- Previous by thread: Re: AzMan Still the way to go?
- Next by thread: Re: AzMan Still the way to go?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|