Re: lack of understanding of principals, identities, and context
From: Bryan Ax (bax_at_kleinbuendel.com)
Date: 08/21/03
- Next message: Kazim Kargi: "Web config security settings"
- Previous message: Lewis Wang [MSFT]: "Re: Opening documents from asp.net fodler sturcture"
- In reply to: Teemu Keiski: "Re: lack of understanding of principals, identities, and context"
- Next in thread: Bryan Ax: "Re: lack of understanding of principals, identities, and context"
- Reply: Bryan Ax: "Re: lack of understanding of principals, identities, and context"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 21 Aug 2003 07:39:02 -0700
>From a performance perspective, which is going to be more efficient -
custom session variables, or recreating an authentication ticket on
every Application_AuthenticateRequest?
There is no other way to maintain a principal and identity without
doing it every request, huh? Bummer.
"Teemu Keiski" <joteke@NOSPAMaspalliance.com> wrote in message news:<#jqC#GyZDHA.1280@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>...
> It really concerns things when authenticating and/or authorizing are hard
> customized and it isn't just Forms Authentication specific. In simple case I
> don't see anything wrong with simple session solution but framework support
> is one main thing why I'd avoid it.
>
> Other thing when it is used would be when you use role-based authentication.
> In that case you could let Forms Authentication to handle the authenticating
> and store roles into the login cookie (UserData property of
> FormsAuthenticationTicket). Then on Application_Authenticaterequest it is
> checked if Request.IsAuthenticated=true (login cookie exists in case Forms
> auth) and then roles read from cookie and again custom IPrincipal populated
> with information regarding roles.
>
> In case when cookies are not allowed, you still can use Forms Authentication
> (I think I have explained it to you earlier). In that case the
> FormsAuthenticationTicket is persisted in the Querystring, but the drawback
> was with keeping this on every page so that login information is persisted
> when user navigates on the site. But if you want to avoid this drawback,
> getting to use cookieless sessions is one solution and that leads to the
> solution you discussed about.
>
> --
> Teemu Keiski
> MCP,Designer/Developer
> Mansoft tietotekniikka Oy
> http://www.mansoft.fi
>
> AspInsiders Member, www.aspinsiders.com
> ASP.NET Forums Moderator, www.asp.net
> AspAlliance Columnist, www.aspalliance.com
>
>
> "Lauchlan M" <LMackinnon@Hotmail.com> kirjoitti viestissä
> news:%23asS0TwZDHA.1280@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > HttpContext is request specific (recreated for every request) and
> therefore
> > > you'd need to set the user on every request that means creating instance
> of
> > > FiveADayPrincipal and assigning it to the Context.User.
> > >
> > > Therefore there exists methods in Global.asax as
> > > Application_AuthenticateRequest as they are called on every request and
> can
> > > be used to set the Principal.
> >
> > So, if you are not using cookies, what is the best way to maintain state
> > across a session? Do you set a session variable, say UserID, when the user
> > logs in, and get the user information from this in the Global.asax
> > Application_AuthenticateRequest each time to repopulate the context
> object?
> >
> > If you've gone this far with rolling your own solution, why bother with
> > setting the MS context authentication stuff on each Global.asax
> > Application_AuthenticateRequest, but instead just check the filepath using
> > HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath() (or whatever else you need to
> configure
> > you authentication framework) and set roles and permissions accordingly in
> > your own framework (eg session variables)?
> >
> > It would not be too heavy (only involving two or three session variables,
> eg
> > userID, role, and permissions).
> >
> > What would be the pros and cons of this approach?
> >
> > MS have not made their forms authentication framework intuitive at all
> IMO.
> >
> > Lauchlan M
> >
> >
- Next message: Kazim Kargi: "Web config security settings"
- Previous message: Lewis Wang [MSFT]: "Re: Opening documents from asp.net fodler sturcture"
- In reply to: Teemu Keiski: "Re: lack of understanding of principals, identities, and context"
- Next in thread: Bryan Ax: "Re: lack of understanding of principals, identities, and context"
- Reply: Bryan Ax: "Re: lack of understanding of principals, identities, and context"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|