Are domain/machine names required when specifying roles

From: Mark Walker (markwalker42@hotmail.com)
Date: 03/27/03 

From: "Mark Walker" <markwalker42@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:21:26 -0800

Is the domain/machine name always required when specifying
roles? I can't get it to work without the full
specification even though most references imply otherwise.

Which way is it supposed to work?

How can this be resolved?

I would really like to create a standard web.config file
using a generic role (other than the builtin\roles) soI
don't have to edit to edit the specific machine or domain
in the web.config file.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Error Reading Package Lists
    ... That should be solved by specifying the 'Cache-Limit' for ... apt in /etc/apt/apt.conf, e.g. like this: ... (Or edit that file manually.) ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: inodes and dedicated disk
    ... OK so I got the bsdlabel to work by killing a and specifying ... don't edit ... newfs: 0: bad extent block size ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: Dont know how to make
    ... I know that - but it's just a source file and it *does* exist.... ... > When you specifying a dependency, make will look for a rule to make ... > If it is a file you edit, you may need to specify its location ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.language)
  • Re: Dont know how to make
    ... Bonj wrote: ... When you specifying a dependency, make will look for a rule to make ... If it is a file you edit, you may need to specify its location ... Andy ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.language)