Re: Managed to Unmanaged security.
From: John Saunders (john.saunders@surfcontrol.com)
Date: 03/24/03
- Next message: Chris Blanco: "Re: Managed to Unmanaged security."
- Previous message: Bob: "Re: Unable to use Kerberos Delegation from IE6 --> IIS 5.0 (asp.net)--> SQL 2000"
- In reply to: Chris Blanco: "Managed to Unmanaged security."
- Next in thread: Chris Blanco: "Re: Managed to Unmanaged security."
- Reply: Chris Blanco: "Re: Managed to Unmanaged security."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "John Saunders" <john.saunders@surfcontrol.com> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:28:23 -0500
This isn't necessarily a security hole if the TCP/IP follows secure paths.
For instance, if it's within a machine, or within your Corporate LAN.
So, I presume you're saying you send the TCP/IP out on the Internet?
-- John Saunders Internet Engineer john.saunders@surfcontrol.com "Chris Blanco" <cblancoNOSPAM@necam.com> wrote in message news:Oro5iFk8CHA.2376@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Currently I am building a custom principle for an ASP.NET solution. I have > some legacy services that I am using. Currently my managed code talks to my > unmanaged code through XML over a proprietary TCP/IP transport. This is a > security hole as the XML is streamed across the TCP/IP channel unencrypted. > What is the recommended way of protecting that XML data? If its is indeed > encryption what methods are available that both Unmanaged and managed code > could use? > >
- Next message: Chris Blanco: "Re: Managed to Unmanaged security."
- Previous message: Bob: "Re: Unable to use Kerberos Delegation from IE6 --> IIS 5.0 (asp.net)--> SQL 2000"
- In reply to: Chris Blanco: "Managed to Unmanaged security."
- Next in thread: Chris Blanco: "Re: Managed to Unmanaged security."
- Reply: Chris Blanco: "Re: Managed to Unmanaged security."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|