Re: Forms based security without cookies?
From: Stephen Barrett (stephen_barrett@nospam.aoncons.com)
Date: 07/24/02
- Next message: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Previous message: Willy Denoyette [MVP]: "Re: CryptoAPI cryptographic service provider (CSP) for this implementation could not be acquired"
- In reply to: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Next in thread: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Reply: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Reply: Fouad Daniëls: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Stephen Barrett" <stephen_barrett@nospam.aoncons.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:47:26 -0400
Thanks for the link, but it just simply talks about normal Forms Based
authentication. This still requires a cookie. I have read since my
original post that FormsBased authentication as written by MS HAS TO HAVE
cookies to work. If you can't use cookies, you have to write your own.
Where would I start to write my own authentication to work like Forms but
without the cookie?
I would think the following steps would need to be done:
1. Trap every request and somehow determine if the user is authenticated
2. If not authenticated, redirect to login keeping track of original URL
they were wanting
3. Check uer/password and if valid, set *something* to know they are
authenticated
4. redirect to original page they were requesting
I was going to try something simple like a value in session object var with
values of 0 for NOT autheticated and 1 for authenticated. So, in step 1, I
would check Session["Authenticated"] for a value of 1. If it is a 1, then
let things go as normal. If it is a 0, perform steps number 2 and 3. In
step 3, if they pass user/password check, then set Session["Authenticated"]
= 1. When the loser finally logs out, then I would simply set
Session["Authenticated"] = 0.
Is this secure? What would be the problems?
Anyone have any other ideas?
"Vladimir Maysuradze" <mvv@ewebcoding.com> wrote in message
news:OKgMcvzMCHA.1624@tkmsftngp10...
> Read this article:
> http://www.fawcette.com/vsm/2002_08/online/chester/default.asp
>
> "Stephen Barrett" <stephen_barrett@nospam.aoncons.com> wrote in message
> news:eSAszryMCHA.2420@tkmsftngp11...
> > Is it possible to do forms based security without actually storing
cookies
> > on the client machine? Forms based security looks like a perfect fit
for
> > our application except we have hundreds of users who have cookies
disabled
> > for one reason or another. We authenticate the users using information
in
> a
> > database, but on machines that have cookies disabled, the site doesn't
> work.
> > We aren't using permanent cookies, just temporary ones with a 20minute
> > timeout.
> >
> > Is there a way to do what forms based security is doing without the
> cookie?
> > If not, what would you recommend my next step be?
> >
> > TIA
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Previous message: Willy Denoyette [MVP]: "Re: CryptoAPI cryptographic service provider (CSP) for this implementation could not be acquired"
- In reply to: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Next in thread: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Reply: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Reply: Fouad Daniëls: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|