Re: CryptoAPI cryptographic service provider (CSP) for this implementation could not be acquired
From: Willy Denoyette [MVP] (willy.denoyette@pandora.be)
Date: 07/24/02
- Next message: Stephen Barrett: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Previous message: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- In reply to: Allen Owen: "Re: CryptoAPI cryptographic service provider (CSP) for this implementation could not be acquired"
- Next in thread: Allen Owen: "Re: CryptoAPI cryptographic service provider (CSP) for this implementation could not be acquired"
- Reply: Allen Owen: "Re: CryptoAPI cryptographic service provider (CSP) for this implementation could not be acquired"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Willy Denoyette [MVP]" <willy.denoyette@pandora.be> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 20:18:46 +0200
"Allen Owen" <alleno@intenda.co.za> wrote in message news:uv6uc7uMCHA.2436@tkmsftngp11...
> Hi,
> This is one possible solution. Another is to turn impersonation on and thus
> user the impersonated user's keystore.
>
This is not true, as the impersonating users profile is not loaded , you can't access the user's keystore.
Willy.
- Next message: Stephen Barrett: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- Previous message: Vladimir Maysuradze: "Re: Forms based security without cookies?"
- In reply to: Allen Owen: "Re: CryptoAPI cryptographic service provider (CSP) for this implementation could not be acquired"
- Next in thread: Allen Owen: "Re: CryptoAPI cryptographic service provider (CSP) for this implementation could not be acquired"
- Reply: Allen Owen: "Re: CryptoAPI cryptographic service provider (CSP) for this implementation could not be acquired"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|