Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: dave <daf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:39:39 0500
Chris Mattern <syscjm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <jeqdnb5oeuFOyZnbnZ2dnUVZ_gdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>, dave wrote:
Keith Keller <kkellerusenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:It is rather difficult to tell; you could work on your coherency.
On 20070323, Nick Maclaren <nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Whether nor not your postings are an act, please stop posting idiocy.
Okay, enough people have debunked Dave's claims; can we please
What *is* my claim?
It appears to be that this kook's unrevealed and unreviewed work
is worth anybody's time, when it is in fact only a step removed
from Jumbo Cosmospheres.
Your statement of the purpose of my original post is not too
far off the mark. But it is clear that no one posting to this thread
(besides myself) has any interest in actually checking out the proof.
So be it.
.
 FollowUps:
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: SSMelaNB
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 References:
 Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: dave
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: Nick Maclaren
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: Unruh
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: dave
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: Marc Espie
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: dave
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: Nick Maclaren
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: Keith Keller
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: dave
 Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 From: Chris Mattern
 Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 Prev by Date: Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 Next by Date: Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 Previous by thread: Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 Next by thread: Re: Direct calculation of Primes  Possible?
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
