# Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?

*From*: Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:24:19 -0700

On 2007-03-23, Nick Maclaren <nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Whether nor not your postings are an act, please stop posting idiocy.

Okay, enough people have debunked Dave's claims; can we please

stop feeding him? Perhaps he'll go away faster if we all ignore

his idiocy.

--keith

--

kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

(try just my userid to email me)

AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt

see X- headers for PGP signature information

.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?***From:*dave

**References**:**Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?***From:*dave

**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?***From:*Nick Maclaren

**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?***From:*Unruh

**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?***From:*dave

**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?***From:*Marc Espie

**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?***From:*dave

**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?***From:*Nick Maclaren

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?** - Next by Date:
**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?** - Next by thread:
**Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?** - Index(es):