Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:24:19 -0700
On 2007-03-23, Nick Maclaren <nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Whether nor not your postings are an act, please stop posting idiocy.
Okay, enough people have debunked Dave's claims; can we please
stop feeding him? Perhaps he'll go away faster if we all ignore
his idiocy.
--keith
--
kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- From: dave
- Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- References:
- Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- From: dave
- Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- From: Unruh
- Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- From: dave
- Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- From: Marc Espie
- Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- From: dave
- Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- Prev by Date: Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- Next by Date: Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- Previous by thread: Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- Next by thread: Re: Direct calculation of Primes - Possible?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|