Re: Negative permissions WITHOUT ACLs
- From: Jeremy Worrells <worrells@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:46:22 +0000 (UTC)
On 2006-10-11, Starfish <frel8817@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello, if someone can answer this question you make a lot of Uppsala
University students happy.
Here goes: How do you specify negative permission¹ in Unix/Linux
without using ACLs?
¹E.g. saying that the user "Ellen" should not have write access to a
file regardless of the permissions given to her groups.
Try making "Ellen" the owner of the file and giving it 464 access.
She is still the owner of the file and can chmod it back, so it depends
on the tech savvy of Ellen.
Other ideas?
--
Jeremy Worrells
Unix Generalist
jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Negative permissions WITHOUT ACLs
- From: Anders Arnholm
- Re: Negative permissions WITHOUT ACLs
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Negative permissions WITHOUT ACLs
- References:
- Negative permissions WITHOUT ACLs
- From: Starfish
- Negative permissions WITHOUT ACLs
- Prev by Date: Re: Negative permissions WITHOUT ACLs
- Next by Date: how to handle long password in HP_IA64
- Previous by thread: Re: Negative permissions WITHOUT ACLs
- Next by thread: Re: Negative permissions WITHOUT ACLs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|