Re: Best practice vs. "We have a secure network" where passwords are concerned
- From: jpd <read_the_sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Dec 2005 17:03:39 GMT
Begin <slrndou6ck.lee.elvis-45187@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 2005-12-01, all mail refused <elvis-45187@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I want a job outside the asylum.
And then you find that stepping out is frowned upon.
Can't we just, I don't know, buy up some hapless company and make all
the puppets dance? I know that isn't practical because compduhing and
induhnet administration is an one to(o) many occupation, but one can
dream, no? (hmmm. Taking over the asylum. I get to be chief of pills!)
--
j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .
This message was originally posted on Usenet in plain text.
Any other representation, additions, or changes do not have my
consent and may be a violation of international copyright law.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Best practice vs. "We have a secure network" where passwords are concerned
- Next by Date: Re: Best practice vs. "We have a secure network" where passwords are concerned
- Previous by thread: Re: Best practice vs. "We have a secure network" where passwords are concerned
- Next by thread: Re: Best practice vs. "We have a secure network" where passwords are concerned
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
