Re: traffic encryption
From: Roman Mashak (mrv_at_tusur.ru)
Date: 08/05/05
- Next message: Roman Mashak: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Previous message: Todd H.: "Re: traffic encryption"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Next in thread: Colin McKinnon: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Reply: Colin McKinnon: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Reply: Bodo Eggert: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Reply: Volker Birk: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:29:49 +0900
Hello, Unruh!
You wrote on 4 Aug 2005 14:36:13 GMT:
??>> only tcp/ip level) between clients and us. Clients will use "real"
??>> addresses (not "grey").
??>> What existing technologies can you recommend to review?
U> ssh?
It's one of ways, but has some inconvenience: entering password before
logging remote system, like that:
#ssh -L 1234:remote.server.com:5000 server.com
here it asks password. Sure, we can avoid it using 'ssh-keygen -t rsa' and
etc. but it's still some burden, due to fact we should manage these keys
among thousands of clients (in my case).
??>> The only problem is clients will use embedded platfrom running linux,
??>> based on ARM9 cpu with FLASH/RAM size limited as well (as I
With best regards, Roman Mashak. E-mail: mrv@tusur.ru
- Next message: Roman Mashak: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Previous message: Todd H.: "Re: traffic encryption"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Next in thread: Colin McKinnon: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Reply: Colin McKinnon: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Reply: Bodo Eggert: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Reply: Volker Birk: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|