Re: traffic encryption
From: Bodo Eggert (7eggert_at_7eggert.dyndns.org)
Date: 08/04/05
- Previous message: Uli Link: "Re: traffic encryption"
- In reply to: Roman Mashak: "traffic encryption"
- Next in thread: Roman Mashak: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Reply: Roman Mashak: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 17:53:45 +0200
Roman Mashak <mrv@tusur.ru> wrote:
> We are designing network for our client now and considering the opportunity
> of traffic encryption (didn't decide yet: full packet or only tcp/ip level)
> between clients and us. Clients will use "real" addresses (not "grey").
You mean no RFC1918-addresses?
> What existing technologies can you recommend to review?
>
> The only problem is clients will use embedded platfrom running linux, based
> on ARM9 cpu with FLASH/RAM size limited as well (as I understand, this will
> make troubles to encrypt/decrypt traffic on client's side? ). That's why one
> of way we're thinking is to put Cisco or any linux/bsd PC between client's
> network and our.
This depends on the nature of the traffic. Does it need to be
- reliable
- upstream
- downstream
- near realtime
- end-to-end-encrypted
-- Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.
- Previous message: Uli Link: "Re: traffic encryption"
- In reply to: Roman Mashak: "traffic encryption"
- Next in thread: Roman Mashak: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Reply: Roman Mashak: "Re: traffic encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
