Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting
From: azuredu (xiao_at_unice.fr)
Date: 04/20/05
- Next message: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- Previous message: azuredu: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- In reply to: Nick Maclaren: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- Next in thread: Trygve Selmer: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- Reply: Trygve Selmer: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 20 Apr 2005 06:11:06 -0700
> I run my Web browser as an unprivileged user in a chroot ghetto
> that has no setuid programs, no devices and no files shared with
Please read the following for discussion of what can be secured for a
browser and what cannot.
http://wims.unice.fr/sysmask/doc/example.txt
In any case, sysmask offers more protection than a simple chroot,
because the process can be made much less exposed to kernel
vulnerabilities.
- Next message: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- Previous message: azuredu: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- In reply to: Nick Maclaren: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- Next in thread: Trygve Selmer: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- Reply: Trygve Selmer: "Re: Sysmask security challenge: 1 week and +300 arbitrary code assaults, still resisting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]