Re: Help with (relatively) securely deleting files?
From: Bodo Eggert (7eggert_at_7eggert.dyndns.org)
Date: 04/10/05
- Previous message: Bodo Eggert: "Re: Help with (relatively) securely deleting files?"
- In reply to: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Help with (relatively) securely deleting files?"
- Next in thread: Robert Nichols: "Re: Help with (relatively) securely deleting files?"
- Reply: Robert Nichols: "Re: Help with (relatively) securely deleting files?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:46:32 +0200
Bev A. Kupf <bevakupf@myhome.net> wrote:
> But in theory, if I had done what I originally proposed, why wouldn't
> it have worked?
Maybe it would, but it's an unpleasent and slow procedure. You're most
probably not supposed to block the machine for a week.
> After all every unused block on the disk would have
> been filled with random data. Would that not overwrite the blocks
> formerly used by the (deleted) files?
This depends on the file system. E.g. reiserfs will store data in "file tail"
areas, which aren't available for dd, except for the (single) file tail.
IMO: If the admin was trustworthy enough to store the files on that system,
you can also trust him not to undelete the files.
-- Funny quotes: 7. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you. Friß, Spammer: zQBVuuxIejE7g@ianncdll.info office@yachtsmen1959pi11s.us
- Previous message: Bodo Eggert: "Re: Help with (relatively) securely deleting files?"
- In reply to: Bev A. Kupf: "Re: Help with (relatively) securely deleting files?"
- Next in thread: Robert Nichols: "Re: Help with (relatively) securely deleting files?"
- Reply: Robert Nichols: "Re: Help with (relatively) securely deleting files?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]