Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: karl malbrain (karl_m_at_acm.org)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: karl malbrain: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Xcott Craver: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:08:35 -0800
"Xcott Craver" <caj@B-r-a-i-n-H-z.com> wrote in message
news:Um7wd.65597$AL5.17182@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> Douglas A. Gwyn <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote:
> > Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
> > > That essentially amounts to 'Have the programmer do the program
> > > correctly' in my understanding.
> >
> > Yes, wouldn't that be an improvement.
>
> So the solution to dangerously bad programming is to grouse
> that the problem shouldn't happen in the first place.
>
> Okay, done, now what's step two?
Break the "application" into layers which can be implemented with
appropriate language and protocols/conventions between the layers. From
what I've seen so far of Ada, it doesn't begin to cover the need for ALL the
layers -- you wouldn't write more than 100K or so lines of code with it (or
with C). karl m
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: karl malbrain: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: Xcott Craver: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
