Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue
From: Walter Roberson (roberson_at_ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca)
Date: 10/16/04
- Previous message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 16 Oct 2004 19:26:20 GMT
In article <MPG.1bdb3378bfa0b724989870@news-server.columbus.rr.com>,
Leythos <void@nowhere.org> wrote:
|> In article <uT8cd.162923$r4.6007112@news-reader.eresmas.com>,
|> Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote:
|> :At least it has to know how to treat passive ftp and DCC.
|DCC is a method to move files in IRC apps (and some others) it does not
|work well with any form of NAT.
Ah. I guess that means that Jose would not consider Cisco PIX to be
a "real" firewall ?
-- Most Windows users will run any old attachment you send them, so if you want to implicate someone you can just send them a Trojan -- Adam Langley
- Previous message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|