Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue
From: Walter Roberson (roberson_at_ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca)
Date: 10/16/04
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Previous message: all mail refused: "Re: wu-ftpd & site exec & tar"
- In reply to: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 16 Oct 2004 18:10:45 GMT
In article <uT8cd.162923$r4.6007112@news-reader.eresmas.com>,
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote:
:Barry Margolin wrote:
:> A basic firewall doesn't have to know about application protocols. If
:> it allows you to block port 25 and allow port 80, it's more than just a
:> NAT box. No, it won't do virus checking on that traffic, but that's an
:> "advanced" firewall feature, not a basic one.
:At least it has to know how to treat passive ftp and DCC.
DCC? Digital Command Control, a standard for controling model
railroads ???
-- Sub-millibarn resolution bio-hyperdimensional plasmatic space polyimaging is just around the corner. -- Corry Lee Smith
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Previous message: all mail refused: "Re: wu-ftpd & site exec & tar"
- In reply to: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]