Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue
From: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez (jkerouac_at_bgsec.com)
Date: 10/16/04
- Previous message: Magda Hewryk: "wu-ftpd & site exec & tar"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:09:16 +0200
Barry Margolin wrote:
> A basic firewall doesn't have to know about application protocols. If
> it allows you to block port 25 and allow port 80, it's more than just a
> NAT box. No, it won't do virus checking on that traffic, but that's an
> "advanced" firewall feature, not a basic one.
At least it has to know how to treat passive ftp and DCC.
-- Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez Director Tecnico de bgSEC jkerouac@bgsec.com bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos http://www.bgsec.com ESPAŅA The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow Roman candles. -- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
- Previous message: Magda Hewryk: "wu-ftpd & site exec & tar"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|