Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue
From: all mail refused (elvis_at_notatla.org.uk)
Date: 10/11/04
- Next message: xmp: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Previous message: David Magda: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- In reply to: David Magda: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 11 Oct 2004 20:10:18 GMT
In article <86oej9axq0.fsf@number6.magda.ca>, David Magda wrote:
>> If ISP's imposed NAT (with no port forwarding) on residential users
>> you would see a lot less of it.
>
>Personally I would want want my ISP to touch my traffic as little as
>possible. At most making sure that the outgoing packets don't have
>forged source headers.
>
>But that's just me.
It's not just you; it's me too.
-- Elvis Notargiacomo master AT barefaced DOT cheek http://www.notatla.org.uk/goen/ 7.031: OnACPower returned value( 0x1 ) which is Equal To 0x1
- Next message: xmp: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Previous message: David Magda: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- In reply to: David Magda: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]