Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue
From: David Magda (dmagda+trace040726_at_ee.ryerson.ca)
Date: 10/11/04
- Next message: all mail refused: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Previous message: Stephan Goeldi: "Re: S: ssh worms FAQ"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: all mail refused: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply: all mail refused: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 11 Oct 2004 14:58:15 -0400
Leythos <void@nowhere.org> writes:
> If ISP's imposed NAT (with no port forwarding) on residential users
> you would see a lot less of it.
Personally I would want want my ISP to touch my traffic as little as
possible. At most making sure that the outgoing packets don't have
forged source headers.
But that's just me.
-- David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>, http://www.magda.ca/ Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI
- Next message: all mail refused: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Previous message: Stephan Goeldi: "Re: S: ssh worms FAQ"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Next in thread: all mail refused: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply: all mail refused: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|