Re: National security backdoor.
From: Nick Maclaren (nmm1_at_cus.cam.ac.uk)
Date: 04/20/04
- Next message: Mikael Holm: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: National security backdoor."
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Next in thread: Mikael Holm: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 20 Apr 2004 19:16:15 GMT
In article <c63ntt$uk5$1@string.physics.ubc.ca>,
Bill Unruh <unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca> wrote:
>Heino Meier <andikr@gmx.de> writes:
>
>]What ?
>
>]> telnetd backdoor is old news. much better backdoor in sshd and remotes in
>]> apache and the new openbsd dos.
>
>]Can you explain the sshd backdoor a bit near? I never heard about it
>
>Not surprising you have not heard about it. It is
>a) So top secret that if you had, you would be dead
>b) A load of codswollop.
>Take your pick.
I prefer the third theory:
c) That version of SSH never got ported to THIS universe.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
- Next message: Mikael Holm: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: National security backdoor."
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Next in thread: Mikael Holm: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]